When screenwriting, a mind that is
attracted to film narratives will automatically (well, if you’re invested as a
creator it’s supposed to) follow the actor’s/ actress’s key styles and
mannerism to intake that for your work. But, one thing that can enhance you directly
is studying what actors study. This
is another one of those things when told could go from profound to “of course”,
but on the other side, some when told would marginalize and restrict themselves
to one area – in this case the writing and language arts studies only.
Nevertheless this is something that someone who is director-bound, or in that
aspiring mindset which can be intrinsically tied, depending, to the writer
mindset, should want to (possibly even without choice) do to dabble into
another area of production, and even having some skillsets in many of them.
I’ve found studying actor training books
and articles to be beneficial. As will be expanded on in the future, I do
understand why some actors, writers or directors, would want to watch out for
their own originality and not, if you will, study
too much. Yes, there is room for this understanding and thus where
limitation are needed, but this type of thought process doesn’t need to be in
the mind of a anyone who hasn’t explored enough
information, in this case of nonfictional reading, that will allow them to have the opportunity to limit where needed.
At any rate, for my own work having
related to this area has been valuable, and here are some main acting
techniques, arranged in my own ordering that I cosign. Other creative writers
can benefit from recognizing them within film in action and use for influences
in their own work:
n Regulating
Emotional Levels
n Relaxation with
your ‘Inner Voice’ before Action
n Improvisation
n Free Association
n Moment-To-Moment
Impulses (Specifically Method Acting)
n The Art of Not
Knowing (A Scene, your character, etc)
n Concentrating On
The Other Actor(s)
n A Director
Blocking Direction To Cause Responses
n Using The
Advantages Of Difference Between Stage And Screen
n Staying In
Character Offscreen (‘Getting Stuck In Your Head’)
Continuing with that said, I do
understand that acting styles just like writing styles given the variety out
there and the originality within, doesn’t necessarily have wholly and at-hand
definitions. Sometimes NOT being able to define something (where ‘The Art of
Not Knowing’ could be applied) the mystery of it can be beneficial, and as far
as what we know, we define it best to make moves accordingly. I like walking
the line: knowing a lot and/or enough and making limits from there on.
Regardless of people’s feelings in the
approach and the originality, what’s clear is writers can and I believe do benefit from either basic or in-depth
studies of actors’ methods; just like them, you can choose and limit
accordingly – whatever works for you. whether by well-known pioneering names behind
systematized versions like Stansberg, Stanislavski's or
Meisner, or whether by studying certain actors/actresses that you fancy directly;
even formulate that ‘style’ based on that person, be them famous, Indie,
underrated, or local.